Inflation   
David Streifling

 


How Managers Judge Whether or Not They Want
to Report a Peer's Unethical Behavior  

Randy K. Chui & Allen F. Stembridge

The Theo-scriptura Worldview: A Viable Option for 21st-Century Educators
Adelino T. Libato

Job Satisfiers and Dissatisfiers Among the Employees
of Adventist International Institute of Advanced Studies: An Analysis   

Nimrod Limbong & Eric Y. Nasution

Distributed Learning: New Horizons for Higher Education
John Wesley Taylor V

Principle-Centered Leadership
S. R. Covey
Reviewed by John Marter

Networked Learning: The Pedagogy of the Internet
M. Haughey and T. Anderson
Reviewed by M. Jean Streifling




    

How Managers Judge Whether or Not They Want to Report a Peer's Unethical Behavior


Abstract: Peer reporting is becoming an important mechanism to control unethical behavior within an organization. This study examined the effect of ethical judgment on peer reporting.  The results show that an individual's ethical ideology (Idealism) significantly predicted peer reporting judgment, and peer reporting judgment tends to give  birth  to peer reporting intention.  Moreover, locus of control was found to significantly moderate the relationship between peer reporting judgment and peer reporting intention.

 

Randy K. Chui & Allen F. Stembridge


Note: Right click the link and save file (link) to download the PDF file.